![]() 07/29/2014 at 19:58 • Filed to: Pierce arrow | ![]() | ![]() |
Who doesn't love a good Pierce Arrow?
![]() 07/29/2014 at 20:02 |
|
God I wish flat windows could make a comeback.
![]() 07/29/2014 at 20:17 |
|
Not I.
![]() 07/29/2014 at 20:18 |
|
I'd say the people who don't like a good Pierce Arrow are the same people who don't like a good Ruxton..
![]() 07/29/2014 at 20:20 |
|
You'd have to be insane to hate either. The paint job on Ruxtons are excellent
![]() 07/29/2014 at 20:21 |
|
Those cars were insane, hell they still are :)
![]() 07/29/2014 at 20:45 |
|
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/27/aut…
I seriously stumbled across this article not 10 minutes after first reading this comment. I think I'm being watched...
![]() 07/29/2014 at 20:46 |
|
I've been wondering since I first heard of them what earthly purpose Ruxtons have in having those giant hub covers. I don't know if I ever figured it out - other than "probably just a stylistic dead end".
![]() 07/29/2014 at 20:49 |
|
That is magnificent!
![]() 07/29/2014 at 20:51 |
|
It had something to do with the FWD system they used if I'm not completly wrong, I guess they used them at the rear as well so that they'd look the same on all four wheels.
![]() 07/29/2014 at 20:53 |
|
Hehe, I'm the one who walks in the shadows, I'm the one who controls the internet, I'm the one who kno.. Nah, not going there mate :) But the Ruxton was a magnificent piece of engineering that somehow ended up as nothing more than an obscure car known only to car nerds.
![]() 07/29/2014 at 20:54 |
|
My sense was that it was some type of full floating axle used in the FWD encouraging the use of a large hub bearing - but it shouldn't have needed to be *that* large. Still, full floating axle FWD would be a solid choice from a design standpoint.
![]() 07/29/2014 at 20:54 |
|
Probably the folks who had a less than 6 figure income in the 30's. But when you saw one, you knew you had seen the best.
Let us not forget the "Galloping Goose(s). All of which still live.
![]() 07/29/2014 at 20:57 |
|
I can't remember right know if I'm honest, and I've been at the pub today so I don't think I should speculate on what is what and whatnot right now anyway (13 pints does not make for a smart brain they say) ;)
![]() 07/29/2014 at 21:12 |
|
Well, a floating axle with a honking huge bearing front and rear was the cause of such a look on the Series Land Rover (II on, anyway), so I sort of imagined the same was probably true here. I saw a picture of the trans setup at one time, and there was definitely *something* making for a big hub - I don't think that picture had the covers on, but I don't think you could see anything either.
![]() 07/29/2014 at 21:13 |
|
One of my all time favorite cars to come out of the era
![]() 07/29/2014 at 21:15 |
|
I think you're correct mate, I've got a feeling that I've read something about something like that somewhere.
![]() 07/29/2014 at 21:19 |
|
LAMcB and I have had Ruxton nerd attacks in the past...
http://oppositelock.jalopnik.com/more-ruxton-15…
http://oppositelock.jalopnik.com/we-need-more-p…
http://oppositelock.jalopnik.com/name-that-chas…
![]() 07/29/2014 at 22:07 |
|
My God, that's class on wheels.
![]() 07/29/2014 at 23:50 |
|
Apparently, people didn't like this one.
![]() 07/30/2014 at 07:48 |
|
Really? That was always one of my favorite ones
![]() 07/30/2014 at 07:52 |
|
People thought it was too unconventional for its time. No running boards? //gasp, shock, horror
![]() 07/30/2014 at 08:07 |
|
At least now years later the car is loved for its excellent design